Commercial Covers vs. Philatelic Covers - How to Tell the Difference
As we said yesterday, sometimes the distinction between commercial covers and philatelic covers can be a bit blurry. But if you're a cover collector, it is essential to be able to determine if a particular cover is commercial or philatelic.
There are perhaps three ways to determine whether or not a cover is commercial in nature:
1. What postage rate is the cover paying as compared to what franking should be on the cover? In other words, were stamps with a face value that is more than what was necessary to mail it used? If so, the cover may be philatelic, although sometimes commercial covers do have more postage than actually necessary on them.
2. In what timeframe were the stamps used on the cover? In other words, were the stamps used within a short period of time after they were issued (more likely to be a commercial use, although first day covers would be an exception), or were they used much later than they were issued (more likely to be a philatelic cover)?
3. How does the cover look? By that we mean, is its overall appearance philatelic or commercial? This is a judgment call, but here are some things to consider in making that judgment.
Have the stamps been very neatly placed on the cover or is their appearance on the envelope a bit haphazard?
Are all the members of a stamp set present or is a single definitive stamp the only franking?
Is it a philatelic cancel from a stamp show or exhibition?
Is it a first day of use?
How is it addressed?
Has it been opened very neatly or a bit roughly?
Some stamp collectors focus on commercial covers, while others focus on philatelic covers. There is nothing wrong with either type, it's all a matter of individual preference. Commercial covers demonstrate how stamps are used in the mail, but their appearance (as far as the stamps are concerned) is usually nothing special. Philatelic covers (because of the stamps that are used) are often quite beautiful. Which type of cover you decide to collect is up to you.
No comments:
Post a Comment